Cost and effectiveness of air drops

13 Feb

1 million dollars(1.3 after adjustment), to manage airdrop flights for one month in 1999.  This figure does not factor in the increase in fuel costs or the cost of supplies that were airdropped.

http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/29/news/mn-42199

30 million dollars worth of US military equipment expended for airdrops in Kosovo.

http://qmfound.com/air_bosnia.htm

Afghan airdrops “did no good”.  Food packets either ruptured because of altitude of drop, or warlords intercepted them and sold them at market.

“impact was marginal”  “some food better than no food”

http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/cra0283.htm

Christian Science Monitor on MSF’s rejection of US food air drops in Afghanistan.

the Geneva conventions define humanitarian action as neutral, independent and impartial. This means that humanitarian actors should not take sides and should be free from political influence so they can go after their objectives single-mindedly – to impartially help people based solely on criteria of need.

If aid is not perceived to be entirely neutral and independent of political objectives it can be claimed by one or both sides as a part of the war effort. Then aid and aid workers become a legitimate target of war. Humanitarian action is supposed to be an expression of hope and humanity in times of darkness – crossing borders and serving victims on both sides, to show even parties at war can care for humanity while fighting their war.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1012/p25s2-wosc.html



Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: